November 18, 2020
Please read today’s article by my good friend John Stossel. It’s worth more than a degree from Yale (as John will explain).
I (P.J. O’Rourke) have known John for… so long that telling you how long I’ve known John would mean revealing our ages. (We’re both 73.)
He is one of the most insightful, logical, and consistent libertarian thinkers of this – and much of the previous – century.
And he came by his libertarianism via an interesting route… John started out as a “consumer” reporter, first at WCBS TV in New York and then for ABC’s Good Morning America. He was one of those journalists whose beat was to cover how producers (those evil capitalists) screw consumers (you, the innocent and helpless TV viewers).
Then John began to realize that it isn’t producers who are doing the screwing… Capitalism is a self-correcting mechanism. Companies that lose the public’s trust then lose the public’s business.
And it isn’t the consumers who are screwed. Consumers are rational individuals who are perfectly able to tell screws from bolts. That is to say, when consumers get screwed, they bolt…
The bad actors in the producer/consumer relationship are the government regulators, endlessly expanding their power and trying to screw us all.
The regulators want to tell the producers what to make, how to make it, and what to charge for their product. The regulators want to tell the consumers what to consume and how to consume it and what price to pay for their consumption.
The government wants to control everybody – producers and consumers, buyers and sellers – and everything they produce and consume. This has been tried before… It worked so well in the old Soviet Union.
The above is a gross oversimplification of John’s development as a libertarian intellectual. And I apologize, John. For a more thorough understanding of John’s philosophy, I suggest consulting his web site: johnstossel.com.
By John Stossel
Yale University has fancy dining halls. They pay no property tax.
Local restaurants struggle to compete, but their tax burden makes that hard.
“We basically pay one-third of our rent in taxes!” complains Matt West, manager of Koon Thai Restaurant. “Yale is a money-making machine.”
It is. Many colleges are.
Yale has a $31 billion endowment. Harvard’s is $40 billion. My alma mater, Princeton, has $26 billion.
Yet, these schools also get government handouts and tax breaks. How government rips-off taxpayers and students by subsidizing colleges is the subject of my video this week.
Yale owns about a quarter of the town of New Haven, Connecticut, but the school pays little property tax. It even has a golf course that’s half tax-exempt.
Politicians tried to tax the school, but they cannot.
“It’s written into the constitution,” complains New Haven Board of Alders President Tyisha Walker-Myers. “They just don’t have to pay.”
Now the city is ticketing more cars to try to cover its budget shortfall.
Everyone else pays more because colleges get tax breaks, government grants, and government loans.
“De-fund universities!” says Inez Stepman, senior policy analyst at the Independent Women’s Forum. “Their entire business model is dependent on the taxpayer.”
I push back: “You make it sound like it’s all government money. But people pay their own way.”
She corrects me: “Without that lifeblood of those federal student loans, very few universities would be able to operate. They are dependent on that federal interference.”
They’re dependent because they’ve raised their prices so much. When I went to college, my tuition was $1,950. Now, Princeton charges $53,890.
After government increased subsidies, colleges raised tuition prices at four times the rate of inflation.
They spend the money not just on golf courses and fancy foods. They build new stadiums, first-class swimming pools, media rooms and some even offer students housekeeping.
Why not spend? Colleges know they will get more money from taxpayers. The federal government is now America’s largest provider of student aid.
“There is no check on the cost of a college degree,” says Stepman. “If students had to walk into Wells Fargo for those loans, Wells Fargo would look at whether or not those loans would be paid back. The federal government doesn’t ask any of those questions.”
So, money is thrown at students who don’t benefit. Today, almost half the students given loans don’t graduate in six years.
Instead, says Stepman, they have “$50,000 or $60,000 or $80,000 in debt, without the degree to show for it.”
Taxpayers lose. Students lose. The winners are bloated colleges.
Colleges say they deserve every loan and tax break because they make “wiser citizens.”
“They’re not,” says Stepman. “They’re making citizens who hate their country.”
I push back again: “Most colleges educate rather than indoctrinate.”
“I wish that were true,” replies Stepman. “I was part of the College Republicans… registering voters. I actually had a professor walk up and spit on me. Another called us the ‘Nazi Youth.’ These are professors!”
“It’s offensive,” she adds, “that we take dollars out of mechanics’ pockets and put them into the pockets of, largely, middle-class and upper-middle-class students.”
It is offensive.
But that’s what America does.
Unfortunately, our next president wants to do even more of it.
John Stossel is author of Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media. For other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.
Love us? Hate us? Let us know how we’re doing at [email protected].
Editor in Chief, American Consequences
With the Editorial Staff
November 18, 2020