November 18, 2019
Dear reader,
What do you think about our November issue – which arrived on Saturday?
And if you haven’t read it yet, what are you waiting for?
- We have our longer stories on our website here so you can read in your browser.
- We have a PDF suitable for printing here.
- And we have an interactive magazine here that will let you “flip” from story to story.
Tell us what you think about our latest magazine at [email protected].
And then read this essay by award-winning journalist John Stossel, where he shows why you should be suspicious about government involvement in health care…
Mandatory Shortages
By John Stossel
Governments create problems. Then they complain about them.
“A public health crisis exists,” says Kentucky’s government, citing a report that found “a shortage of ambulance providers.”
Local TV stations report on “people waiting hours for medical transportation.”
“Six-year-old Kyler Truesdell fell off his motorcycle,” reported Channel 12 news. “The local hospital told (his mother) he should be transported to Cincinnati Children’s to check for internal injuries.” But there was no ambulance available. Kyler had to wait two hours.
Yet Kyler’s cousin, Hannah Howe, runs an ambulance service in Ohio, just a few minutes away. “We would’ve (taken him) for free,” she says in my new video. “But it would’ve been illegal.”
It would be illegal because of something called certificate of need (“CON”) laws.
Kentucky and three other states require businesses to get a CON certificate before they are allowed to run an ambulance service. Certificates go only to businesses that bureaucrats deem “necessary.”
CON laws are supposed to prevent “oversupply” of essential services like, well, ambulances. If there are “too many” ambulance companies, some might cut corners or go out of business. Then patients would suffer, say the bureaucrats.
Of course, Kentucky patients already suffer, waiting.
It raises the question: If there’s demand, then who are politicians to say that a business is unnecessary?
Phillip Truesdell, Hannah’s father, often takes patients to hospitals in Kentucky, “I drop them off (but) I can’t go back and get them!” he told me. “Who gives the big man the right to say, ‘You can’t work here’?!”
Government.
Phillip and Hannah applied for a CON certificate and waited 11 months for a response. Then they learned that their application was being protested by existing ambulance providers.
Of course it was. Businesses don’t like competition.
“We go to court, these three ambulance services showed up,” recounts Howe.
“They hammered her, treated her like she was a criminal,” says Truesdell. “Do you know what you’re going to do to this company?! … To this town?!”
“It wasn’t anything to do with us being physically able to do it. (They) just came through like the big dog not trying to let anybody else on the porch,” says Howe.
Three other ambulance companies also applied for permission to operate in Kentucky. They were rejected, too.
Truesdell and Howe were lucky to find the Pacific Legal Foundation, a law firm that fights for Americans’ right to earn a living.
Pacific Legal lawyer Anastasia Boden explains: “Traditionally we allow consumers to decide what’s necessary. Existing operators are never going to say more businesses are necessary.”
One Kentucky ambulance provider who opposed the new applications sent me a statement that says “saturating a community with more EMS agencies than it can… support (leads) all agencies to become watered down.”
Boden replies: “That’s just absurd. We now recognize that competition leads to efficient outcomes.”
It’s not just ambulance companies and people waiting for ambulances who are hurt by CON laws. Thirty-five states demand that businesses such as medical imaging companies, hospitals, and even moving companies get CON certificates before they are allowed to open.
Boden warns: “Once you get these laws on the books, it’s very hard to get them off. Monopolies like their monopoly. This started back in the ’70s with the federal government.”
But the feds, amazingly, wised up and repealed the mandate in 1987, saying things like, “CON laws raise considerable competitive concerns (and) consumers benefit from lower prices when provider markets are more competitive.”
Unfortunately, politicians in Kentucky and many other states haven’t wised up.
When Virginia tried to abolish its CON law, local hospitals spent $200,000 on ads claiming competition will force hospitals to close. Somehow, hospitals operate just fine in states without CON laws. But the Virginia scare campaign worked. The state still has a CON law.
In health care, and all fields, it’s better to see what competition can do rather than letting the government and its cronies decide what to allow.
Now here are some of the stories we’re reading…
Where does fake movie money come from?
Instead of “United States Federal Reserve,” the words under the “100” in the top left corner read “Unreal Fake Currency Reserve.”
Baltimore records 300 homicides for fifth consecutive year
At this point last year, there were 268 homicides and 582 nonfatal shootings. The city recorded a total of 309 homicides last year and 342 the year before.
How the MV Lyubov Orlova, a cruise ship named for a Soviet movie star, met its end as a ‘cannibal rat-infested ghost ship’ in the Atlantic.
Read our latest issues of American Consequences by clicking here.
And let us know what you’re reading at [email protected].
Regards,
Steven Longenecker
Publisher, American Consequences
With P.J. O’Rourke and the Editorial Staff
November 18, 2019
